Our Other Sites: GunMarket.us | C&R Blog

Gun Myths.com Rotating Header Image

New Site: GunMarket.us - Free Gun Classifieds

Free Gun Classifieds

Free Gun Classifieds

Just a quick note to let everyone know that I’ve launched a new free gun classifieds site, GunMarket.us.

This site was created in response to the Reddit Guns community needing a “site like craigslist” to post free gun classifieds. All listings are 100% free, as in free beer. Free image hosting is included with the listings too. There is no registration required to post a listing.

I’ve set up a demo listing showing the features available, and you can search the whole US or by state and region, just like Craigslist. There is a also a “Looking to Buy” section where you can post what you are looking for.

It’s a new free site for gun collectors and shooting fans- I need help filling it up with listings! Tell your friends about it and lets get it rolling! If you can think of a feature that is missing feel free to use the contact form on this site or contact me directly at contact (at) gunmarket.us

Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: Assault weapons are used in 16% of homicides

Fact: This figure was concocted to promote an “assault weapons” bill in New York. The classification scheme used encompassed most firearms sold in the U.S. since 1987 (center fire rifles and shotguns holding more than six cartridges, and handguns holding more than 10 rounds). By misclassifying “assault weapons”, they expanded the scope of a non-problem.

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: Assault weapons can be easily converted to machine guns

Fact: Firearms that can be “readily converted” are already prohibited by law.1

Fact: None of the firearms on the list of banned weapons can be readily converted.2

Fact: Only 0.15% of over 4,000 weapons confiscated in Los Angeles in one year were converted, and only 0.3% had any evidence of an attempt to convert.3

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. U.S. Code title 26, subtitle E, Chapter 53, subchapter B, part 1, section 5845
  2. BATF test as reported in the New York Times, April 3, 1989
  3. Jimmy Trahin, Los Angeles Detective, Congressional testimony, Subcommittee on the Constitution of the Committee on the Judiciary, May 5, 1989, 101st Congress, 1st Session. May 5, 1989. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office. p. 379
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: Gun makers are selling plastic guns that slip through metal detectors

Fact: There is no such thing as a ‘plastic gun’. This myth started in 19801 when Glock began marketing a handgun with a polymer frame, not the entire firearm. Most of a Glock is metal (83% by weight), detectable in common metal and x-ray detectors. “[D]espite a relatively common impression to the contrary, there is no current non-metal firearm not reasonably detectable by present technology and methods in use at our airports today, nor to my knowledge, is anyone on the threshold of developing such a firearm.”2

Incidentally, Glock is one of the favorite handguns of police departments because it is lightweight, thanks to the polymer frame.

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. Heckler and Koch made a polymer framed firearm earlier, in 1968, but the myth seems to have erupted after Glock began promoting theirs to police departments.
  2. Billie Vincent, FAA Director of Civil Aviation Security, House Subcommittee on Crime, May 15, 1986
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: The 1994 (former) Federal Assault Weapons Ban was effective

assault

Fact: “ … we cannot clearly credit the ban with any of the nation’s recent drop in gun violence.”1

Fact: The ban covered only 1.39% of the models of firearms on the market, so the ban’s effectiveness is automatically limited.

Fact: “The ban has failed to reduce the average number of victims per gun murder incident or multiple gunshot wound victims.”2

Fact: “The public safety benefits of the 1994 ban have not yet been demonstrated.”3

Fact: “The ban triggered speculative price increases and ramped-up production of the banned firearms”4

Fact: “The ban … ramped-up production of the banned firearms prior to the law’s implementation”5 and thus increased the total supply over the following decade.

Fact: The Brady Campaign claims that “After the 1994 ban, there were 18% fewer “assault weapons” traced to crime in the first eight months of 1995 than were traced in the same period in 1994”. However they failed to note (and these are mentioned in the NIJ study) that:

  1. Assault weapons” traces were minimal before the ban (due to their infrequent use in crimes), so an 18% change enters the realm of statistical irrelevancy.
  2. Fewer “assault weapons” were available to criminals because collectors bought-up the available supply before the ban.

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. “An Updated Assessment of the Federal Assault Weapons Ban: Impacts on Gun Markets and Gun Violence, 1994-2003”, National Institute of Justice, June 2004
  2. “Impacts of the 1994 Assault Weapons Ban: 1994-96.”, National Institute of Justice, March 1999
  3. Ibid
  4. Ibid
  5. Ibid
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: Other countries register guns to fight crime

Fact: Most of these laws were enacted in the post World War I period to prevent civil uprisings as had occurred in Russia. A report of “Committee on the Control of Firearms,” written by the British Home Office officials in 1918, was the basis for registration in the U.K., Australia, Canada, and New Zealand.1

Fact: Though restrictions were few in the United States and the number of legally held handguns exceeded those on the Canadian side by a factor of 10, rates of homicide were virtually identical.2

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. Steven W. Kendrick, “Response to Philip Alpers’ submission to the California State Assembly Select Committee on Gun Violence”, January 2000
  2. Professor Brandon Centrewall , American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 134, Page 1245-65
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: Police want a ballistic database

Fact: “The National Fraternal Order of Police does not support any Federal requirement to register privately owned firearms with the Federal government,” the group said. “And, even if such a database is limited to firearms manufactured in the future, the cost to create and maintain such a system, with such small chances that it would be used to solve a firearm crime, suggests to the F.O.P. that these are law enforcement dollars best spent elsewhere.”1

Fact: “We in law enforcement know it will not, does not, cannot work. Then, no one has considered the hundreds of millions of guns in the US that have never been registered or tested or printed.”2

Fact: “One, the barrel is one of the most easily changed parts of many guns and two, the barrel, and the signature it leaves on a bullet is constantly changing.”3

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. ”F.O.P. Viewpoint: Ballistics Imaging and Comparison Technology“, FOP Grand Lodge, October 2002.
  2. Joe Horn, Detective, Retired.. Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Dept., Small Arms Expert.
  3. Ted Deeds, chief operating officer of The Law Enforcement Alliance of America, Dodge Globe, Oct 24, 2002.
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn

Myth: A database of ballistic profiles will allow police to trace gun crimes

Fact: The National Research Council deemed a national ballistics database as impractical due to practical limitations of current technology for generating and comparing images of ballistic markings.1

Fact: Maryland’s ballistics database “is not doing anything”2 and “has not met the mission statement of the state police.”3 In the first five years of implementation, it failed to lead to any criminal arrest or convictions, despite collecting over 80,000 specimens at a cost of $2,567,633.4

Fact: More than 70% of armed career criminals get their guns from “off-the-street sales” and “criminal acts” such as burglaries5, and 71% of these firearms are stolen.6 Tracing these firearms will not lead to the criminals, as the trail stops at the last legal owner.

Fact: Computer image matching of cartridges fails between 38-62% of the time, depending on whether the cartridges are from the same or different manufacturers.7

Fact: “Automated computer matching systems do not provide conclusive results” requiring that “potential candidates be manually reviewed”.8

Fact: Criminals currently remove serial numbers from stolen guns to hide their origin. The same simple shop tools can change a ballistic profile within minutes. “The minor alteration required less than 5 minutes of labor”.9 Criminals will make changing ballistic profiles part of their standard procedures.

This is an excerpt from “Gun Facts” by Guy Smith, available free from http://www.gunfacts.info

  1. “Ballistic Imaging”, Daniel Cork, John Rolph, Eugene Meieran, Carol Petrie, National Research Council, 2008.
  2. Col. Thomas E. Hutchins, the state police superintendent, “Maryland State Police Report Recommends Suspending Ballistics ID System”, WBAL-TV web site, January 17, 2005.
  3. Sgt. Thornnie Rouse, Maryland State police spokesman, Ibid.
  4. MD-IBIS Progress Report #2, Maryland State Police Forensic Sciences Division, September 2004.
  5. “Protecting America”, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 1992.
  6. “Armed and Considered Dangerous”, U.S. Department of Justice, 1986.
  7. “Feasibility of a Ballistics Imaging Database for All New Handgun Sales”, Frederic Tulleners, California Department of Justice, Bureau of Forensic Services, October, 2001.
  8. Ibid
  9. Ibid
Share this info:
  • Print this article!
  • E-mail this story to a friend!
  • Reddit
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • MySpace
  • StumbleUpon
  • LinkedIn
  • Fark
  • Google
  • Technorati
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • blogmarks
  • BlogMemes
  • Blogosphere News
  • Furl
  • Ma.gnolia
  • NewsVine
  • Propeller
  • Simpy
  • Sphinn